Conserving Our Submerged Lands
By Ronan Roche and Jay Udelhoven
How might underwater mapping techniques, which
identify important habitats, lead to true conservation action?
Underwater land, often referred to as “submerged land,” has
special legal characteristics that distinguish it from terrestrial
land. It is common to hear that “you can’t own the bottom”
when referring to lands submerged by marine waters. However,
lands lying beneath coastal waters have been leased for
commercial purposes for centuries and have also been bought
and sold in some instances. Worldwide, nations generally hold
their submerged lands and coastal waters to be the property
of the state. As a result, the majority of marine conservation
programs are government-driven and managed. This contrasts
with the terrestrial situation, where there is a longer history
of private conservation initiatives and considerable private
land ownership. However, there are examples worldwide of
private conservation initiatives operating in the marine environment.
In the United Kingdom, where the Crown Estate
associated with the monarchy owns most submerged lands, a
private organization, the National Trust, leases or owns over
700 miles of intertidal and coastal lands. This means that in the
United Kingdom, excluding Scotland, 10 percent of coastline is
protected by a private organization.
In Rhode Island, almost all submerged land is publicly
owned. Land beneath the high-tide line is subject to the Public
Trust Doctrine, a set of rules whose lineage can be traced
through Roman to English law. As one of the original colonies,
Rhode Island received title to its lands initially as a charter
from King Charles II. In 1663, Roger Williams secured from
the king a charter for “Rhode Island and Providence Plantations,”
which held a land grant and included title to tidal lands.
This was based upon English common law, in which the title
and the dominion in lands flowed by the tide were held by the
king for the benefit of the nation.
The Public Trust Doctrine protects the rights of the
public to use submerged lands in certain ways, even if those
lands are sold to a private entity. These protected uses generally
include fishing, fowling, and navigation. In the Rhode Island
Constitution, protected activities include fishing from the
shore, leaving the shore to swim in the sea, passage along the
shore, and the now somewhat anachronistic activity of gathering
seaweed from the shore. However, the constitution also
provides that it shall be the duty of the General Assembly to
provide for the preservation, regeneration, and restoration of
the natural environment of the state. Thus there is a need for
balance in the uses of the submerged lands of the state to ful-
fill all of these requirements. In Rhode Island, it is the General
Assembly that is the ultimate arbitrator between competing
uses of submerged lands.
Recent work undertaken at the University of Rhode
Island (URI) Coastal Institute has been looking into how nongovernmental
organizations could conserve submerged land.
For example, in some states, The Nature Conservancy—an
environmental organization perhaps best known for its use
of acquisition and easements for land protection—has already
applied its strategies to the underwater environment. It
has acquired over 25,000 acres of submerged marine lands for
conservation and restoration in North Carolina, Virginia, New
York, Texas, and Washington State. One of the first steps in the
process, just as on land, is to identify critical habitats and sites in
need of protection and restoration. It is here that underwater
mapping technologies, such as those being used by the BayMap
and MapCoast projects, could help conservation leasing and
ownership efforts to determine what areas should be prioritized
or which areas contain habitats required for marine species,
such as shellfish, to survive.
Submerged land in Rhode Island is currently leased by the
Coastal Resources Management Council mainly for shellfish
aquaculture purposes. There is a long tradition of aquaculture
leasing in Rhode Island. In 1844, a shellfish commission was
established that had authority to lease submerged lands for oyster
growing—by 1880 there were already over 1,000 acres of
leased bottom in Narragansett Bay. Production reached a pronounced
peak in 1910, when 20,000 acres of submerged lands
were leased, and oysters made up more than half of the value of
all the fisheries in Rhode Island.
More recently, there has been substantial research carried
out highlighting the beneficial filtering effects that oysters have
on estuarine ecosystems. Chesapeake Bay is one area in which
the enormous oyster populations once present are suggested to
have had a crucial role in maintaining the clarity and quality of
Chesapeake Bay water. There are now major efforts under way
to restore these oyster reefs and help improve the ecological
quality of Chesapeake Bay. More locally, the R.I. Department of
Environmental Management and NOAA have used the settlement
from the North Cape oil spill of 1996 to initiate the R.I.
Shellfish Restoration Program, which aims to restore scallop,
oyster, and quahog populations in Narragansett Bay.
However, it is widely acknowledged that much work remains
to be done in both conserving submerged resources and
restoring shellfish populations, and as we look to the future,
private conservation of submerged lands, carried out in partnership
with state agencies and informed by underwater mapping
efforts, could have an important role to play. Whilst mapping
of ecological and oceanographic features is essential to expand
current knowledge, an understanding of the ownership and
human-use aspects of submerged lands is also needed to determine
where appropriate actions such as development or conservation
can be carried out.
—Ronan Roche is a URI Coastal Institute IGERT (Integrative Graduate
Education and Research Traineeship) Project Trainee and a URI
Marine Affairs Graduate Student. Jay Udelhoven is Senior Policy Advisor
for The Nature Conservancy’s Global Marine Initiative.
|