A Climate-Changed Bay
By Barry A. Costa-Pierce and Alan Desbonnet
There is consensus among scientists
who study the Bay that the
climate change signal is distinct and
strong in Narragansett Bay, with broad
implications for altering the ecology
and circulation of the ecosystem.
Bay water temperatures have
risen about 2°C in winter and 1°C in
summer over the past few decades,
and it is predicted that Rhode Island air
temperatures could increase 5°C in the
coming years. If so, it is projected that
the Narragansett Bay ecosystem will
approximate coastal ecosystems currently
found in South Carolina.
Over the last 50 years, the ecosystem
of Narragansett Bay has been
changed by nutrient loading and over-
fishing. Nutrients “fertilize” the water,
which promotes algal growth and can
lead to decreased dissolved oxygen
for other aquatic plants and animals.
Increases in average annual sea surface
temperatures amplify these effects to
exert major new forces of change on
the ecosystem.
Nutrient loading to the upper Bay
is beyond the threshold considered
acceptable for eelgrass. Increased algal
growth can block sunlight from reaching
the eelgrass and diminish water
quality. When warming waters due
to climate change are added, eelgrass
restoration efforts in the upper Bay
are less than successful. Nuisance algae,
common in upper Bay areas historically,
now predominate in the urban
reaches, but hard data are not available
to track trends over time. The R.I.
Department of Environmental Management
fisheries trawl surveys provide a
convincing story of macroalgal increase
in the upper Bay in recent decades: In
the mid-1980s, trawls in waters less
than 6 meters deep were halted after
the trawl nets were rapidly filled and
choked with algae upon being set. In
2004, all trawl survey stations in the
upper Bay were abandoned for this
reason. Warming temperatures due to
climate change, combined with high
nutrient loadings in the upper Bay, are
at least partially responsible for this
increase in algae.
Shifts in precipitation are also
a major element of climate change, and the indication is that precipitation
volume is increasing over time in
the Bay region. The Narragansett Bay
watershed is witnessing as much as a
30 percent increase in precipitation
since 1900. Precipitation is critically
important to the behavior and flow of
nutrients into Narragansett Bay.
Nutrients arrive in Narragansett
Bay in pulses, driven by rainstorms that
move large quantities of nitrogen from
river and sewage treatment facilities
with storm-water overflows to Bay
waters. Impervious surfaces in the watershed,
such as paved roads or parking
lots, continue to increase as urbanization
and landscape development proceed;
and with increased precipitation,
nutrients from runoff of these surfaces
will increase.
Climate change may be a key to
predicting the effects of nutrients on
shallow, well-mixed ecosystems such
as Narragansett Bay. A few degrees’
increase in annual surface water temperature
is significant in shallow water
systems such as Narragansett Bay,
exacerbating nutrient impacts to plankton,
shellfish, and other bottom-dwelling
organisms, macroalgae, eelgrass,
and fish. How climate change will fully
impact the Bay ecosystem is nearly
impossible to accurately predict, but
certainly change will occur at various,
if not all, ecosystem levels, and these
changes can be unexpected and sometimes
startling.
For instance, the 2°C to 3°C
warming currently affecting the Bay
has drastically reduced the magnitude
of its fundamental food production
process—the annual winter-spring
phytoplankton (notably diatoms)
bloom—the ecological bedrock of the
Narragansett Bay ecosystem. Copepods,
the minute crustaceans that eat
diatoms and are an important food
source for other animals, are declining.
Researchers are now finding an almost
complete lack of copepods during summer
months in Narragansett Bay. With
this link in the food web removed,
impacts on other components of the
ecosystem, including species declines,
are not yet known.
There is speculation that if nutrient
levels decline because of reduced
discharges from wastewater treatment
facilities, the magnitude of winter-spring
blooms may be further suppressed,
resulting in an even more reduced
supply of nitrogen available during the
summer period when there is already
evidence of food limitation in the ecosystem
of the mid- and lower Bay.
Fulweiler et al. (2007) found shifts
in grazing and/or increased cloudiness
that have caused a 40 percent decrease
in primary production in Narragansett
Bay over the past three decades. For
the first time anywhere in the world,
these authors found that the sediments
of a rich, shallow-water estuary during
summer months switched from their
traditional role as nitrogen sinks to
being a source of nitrogen. They calculated
that the Bay’s sediments now release
a huge amount of nitrogen to the
Bay’s water column, equal to as much
as 60 percent of all of the nitrogen being
added by sewage to the Bay! This
massive output from the sediments
has many potential ramifications for
the ecology of the Bay and of nearby
Rhode Island Sound.
The warming of the Bay has also
increased the abundance of a ctenophore
(comb jelly) that has extended
its range as well as its seasonal cycle
of abundance. Because of warming,
the comb jellies become abundant
earlier in the season. Ctenophores are
voracious predators that lower the
population densities of Bay zooplankton
during summer months, allowing
a summer phytoplankton bloom to
occur in the upper Bay. Late summer
blooms might heighten the problem
of low oxygen (hypoxia) by providing
more organic matter to bottom waters
for decomposition—a process that
consumes oxygen—during that period
of the summer season when the upper
Bay is most susceptible to hypoxia.
An additional concern is that the
warming of Narragansett Bay may allow
southern species, including invasive
species, to expand their range northward
and infiltrate the Bay ecosystem,
further impacting its rapidly changing
ecology. In recent memory, the lowly mussel fishery. And the lionfish, a voracious,
invasive predator from more
tropical waters, has been noted in waters
near Jamestown.
The questions that arise and the
problems posed to coastal ecosystem
managers due to climate change are
numerous, significant, and surprising.
There is every indication that the
warming trend will continue, and it
appears New England will continue to
get wetter as well, at least over the
near term. Any ecosystem-based management
schemes must incorporate
and consider climate change, which
is impacting our ecosystems even as
mitigation measures are being drafted
and studies conducted. Management
strategies will need to be flexible, able
to respond to changing climate and the
shifts it brings to the Narragansett Bay
ecosystem. To do otherwise will be neither
productive nor prudent.
Further Reading
Desbonnet, A. and B.A. Costa-Pierce (Eds.). 2007. Science for Ecosystem-Based Management: Narragansett
Bay in the 21st Century. Springer Series
on Environmental Management, New
York, N.Y. 430pp.
Fulweiler, R.W., S.W. Nixon, B.A.
Buckley, and S.L. Granger. 2007. Reversal
of the net dinitrogen gas flux
in coastal marine sediments. Nature
448:180–182.
—Barry A. Costa-Pierce is Rhode Island
Sea Grant Director. Alan Desbonnet is
Rhode Island Sea Grant Assistant Director.
|